<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Headlines: Do You Really Need 200 To Land A Good One?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/</link>
	<description>How to Get Clients To Come To You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:24:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thijs van Noort</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Thijs van Noort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Very helpfull, thnx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very helpfull, thnx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copywriting 101: An Introduction to Copywriting - Global Point Forum</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Copywriting 101: An Introduction to Copywriting - Global Point Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 02:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/#comment-254</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Headlines: Do You Really Need 200 to Land a Good One?” — Attversumption.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D'Souza</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D'Souza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s impossible to change a perception. And if you believe the logic is flawed, then it&#039;s impossible for me to even suggest otherwise.

However...

Most of the people who&#039;ve been through a Target Profile exercise will willingly debate this issue with you. And we spend over five days at a workshop, working on this singular point of &#039;Target Profile.&#039; 

After five days, you&#039;re in one camp or the other. You either believe it&#039;s hogwash. Or you&#039;re convinced that it&#039;s not. The point is: So far we&#039;ve got no takers in the hogwash category. 

And as I said, it&#039;s impossible to prove a point in fifty words what literally takes five days to learn. 

We&#039;re not talking about segment at all. We are indeed talking about ONE person. ONE, singular person on the planet. Not a persona, not a segment, but one person. 

The analogy with &#039;eating a meal&#039; doesn&#039;t come into play at all, because as far as the person is concerned, it&#039;s a &#039;one-dish&#039; restaurant. That restaurant was built around this one person and one dish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s impossible to change a perception. And if you believe the logic is flawed, then it&#8217;s impossible for me to even suggest otherwise.</p>
<p>However&#8230;</p>
<p>Most of the people who&#8217;ve been through a Target Profile exercise will willingly debate this issue with you. And we spend over five days at a workshop, working on this singular point of &#8216;Target Profile.&#8217; </p>
<p>After five days, you&#8217;re in one camp or the other. You either believe it&#8217;s hogwash. Or you&#8217;re convinced that it&#8217;s not. The point is: So far we&#8217;ve got no takers in the hogwash category. </p>
<p>And as I said, it&#8217;s impossible to prove a point in fifty words what literally takes five days to learn. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re not talking about segment at all. We are indeed talking about ONE person. ONE, singular person on the planet. Not a persona, not a segment, but one person. </p>
<p>The analogy with &#8216;eating a meal&#8217; doesn&#8217;t come into play at all, because as far as the person is concerned, it&#8217;s a &#8216;one-dish&#8217; restaurant. That restaurant was built around this one person and one dish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/#comment-243</guid>
		<description>I commented a while back already, but I get an email every time someone comments, so after thinking about it more I thought I&#039;d comment again.  

I think this logic is flawed and really has nothing to do with writing headlines.  All you are really doing is substituting the term &quot;target audience&quot; for &quot;segment&quot;.  In effect, you are doing nothing different. While yes, when deciding who you are talking to, you should consider the target/segment from a personal point of view, but don&#039;t fool yourself into thinking this is something new. This process is still attempting to develop a message that will be relevant to a larger group.  Even when you know what that message is, you still have to craft a good way to communicate that message. Thats why you might write many headlines. It&#039;s the same reason you don&#039;t order the first thing you see on the menu when you go out to eat. You look at your options and choose the one that sounds the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I commented a while back already, but I get an email every time someone comments, so after thinking about it more I thought I&#8217;d comment again.  </p>
<p>I think this logic is flawed and really has nothing to do with writing headlines.  All you are really doing is substituting the term &#8220;target audience&#8221; for &#8220;segment&#8221;.  In effect, you are doing nothing different. While yes, when deciding who you are talking to, you should consider the target/segment from a personal point of view, but don&#8217;t fool yourself into thinking this is something new. This process is still attempting to develop a message that will be relevant to a larger group.  Even when you know what that message is, you still have to craft a good way to communicate that message. Thats why you might write many headlines. It&#8217;s the same reason you don&#8217;t order the first thing you see on the menu when you go out to eat. You look at your options and choose the one that sounds the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/#comment-242</guid>
		<description>I was never a believer in the buckshot approach myself. You might hit several targets but not with enough pellets to bring down any of them. Like keywords, a press release needs to be specific and targeted. It&#039;s the best shot we have at appealing to someone who&#039;s likely to connect with our message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was never a believer in the buckshot approach myself. You might hit several targets but not with enough pellets to bring down any of them. Like keywords, a press release needs to be specific and targeted. It&#8217;s the best shot we have at appealing to someone who&#8217;s likely to connect with our message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Great Copywriting ResourcesSearch Engine Optimization and Internet Marketing Service</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Great Copywriting ResourcesSearch Engine Optimization and Internet Marketing Service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 01:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/#comment-239</guid>
		<description>[...] â€śHeadlines: Do You Really Need 200 to Land a Good One?â€ť - The tricky headlines. Your first message to the reader is a headline. Miss it and he&#8217;s gone. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] â€śHeadlines: Do You Really Need 200 to Land a Good One?â€ť &#8211; The tricky headlines. Your first message to the reader is a headline. Miss it and he&#8217;s gone. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iwona</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>iwona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/#comment-231</guid>
		<description>excellent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>excellent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Shallow</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Shallow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>A very interesting article, Sean. It&#039;s always difficult to define a segment, or even a niche, in practice. The theory is easy enough to understand but . . . 
Ideally, we&#039;d all be marketing to a market of one who we know (almost) as well as well as we know ourselves!
Chris marketing lecturer / consultant in Prague</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very interesting article, Sean. It&#8217;s always difficult to define a segment, or even a niche, in practice. The theory is easy enough to understand but . . .<br />
Ideally, we&#8217;d all be marketing to a market of one who we know (almost) as well as well as we know ourselves!<br />
Chris marketing lecturer / consultant in Prague</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Dalton</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Great article, I&#039;m a believer in this type of thinking for sure. If you chase two rabbits they&#039;ll both get away! Although only 25% of the target market (young mothers etc) may have Katie&#039;s personality or profile, you would have a considerably higher response rate by directly targeting them via a highly focussed campaign than if you had a general campaign targeting everyone! Look for the markets within the market!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, I&#8217;m a believer in this type of thinking for sure. If you chase two rabbits they&#8217;ll both get away! Although only 25% of the target market (young mothers etc) may have Katie&#8217;s personality or profile, you would have a considerably higher response rate by directly targeting them via a highly focussed campaign than if you had a general campaign targeting everyone! Look for the markets within the market!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D'Souza</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D'Souza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/headlines-do-you-really-need-200-to-land-a-good-one/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Provocative? Not really. We run a business based on less than 300 people. Communication doesn&#039;t have to be mass, and doesn&#039;t have to appeal to tens of thousands of people. And more importantly, a business doesn&#039;t need to be making $500k per customer. One $500k customer is probably more money than most small businesses can spend all year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Provocative? Not really. We run a business based on less than 300 people. Communication doesn&#8217;t have to be mass, and doesn&#8217;t have to appeal to tens of thousands of people. And more importantly, a business doesn&#8217;t need to be making $500k per customer. One $500k customer is probably more money than most small businesses can spend all year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
