<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Case Study On Over 100% Improved Consumption&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/</link>
	<description>How to Get Clients To Come To You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:24:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean D'Souza</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D'Souza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>The Protege Program at www.psychotactics.com/protege.htm is largely group-consulting based (so it is service-oriented)--Come to think of it, all businesses are service-oriented, even if you sell products. 

But we want to buck the trend. And have been doing so for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Protege Program at <a href="http://www.psychotactics.com/protege.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.psychotactics.com/protege.htm</a> is largely group-consulting based (so it is service-oriented)&#8211;Come to think of it, all businesses are service-oriented, even if you sell products. </p>
<p>But we want to buck the trend. And have been doing so for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawud Miracle</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawud Miracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;most marketers completely focus on attraction and conversion, and forget about consumption.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ve seen that a lot, Sean. It makes sense what you&#039;re saying. I&#039;ve often thought that it would be better for my business to work with fewer clients and help them &#039;use&#039; my knowledge and get results then to simply work everybody I can and just give them my knowledge.

Of course, I&#039;m speaking of services here and not products so much. And, of course, there&#039;s a premium for working with me in that regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>most marketers completely focus on attraction and conversion, and forget about consumption.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen that a lot, Sean. It makes sense what you&#8217;re saying. I&#8217;ve often thought that it would be better for my business to work with fewer clients and help them &#8216;use&#8217; my knowledge and get results then to simply work everybody I can and just give them my knowledge.</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m speaking of services here and not products so much. And, of course, there&#8217;s a premium for working with me in that regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D'Souza</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D'Souza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Yes and no.

It depends on how the products are engineered. If you subscribe to the products, and they have a finite life cycle, then you&#039;re kinda doomed.

E.g. You go to a restaurant, and order a meal, and it&#039;s a buffet, so darn...you&#039;re stuck. Eat like a piggie, or get less value than you expected. But hey, there&#039;s also the concept of a takeaway. 

Now if the restaurant (read: infoproduct) is built as a buffet, then you&#039;re in big trouble. But if the restaurant is built as a normal restaurant, then there are two options. The waiter dumps everything in the bin--or you take home the food and eat it another day.

Everything depends on two personalities. The personality of the waiter. And the personality of the diner. But there&#039;s one personality that has a little edge. The diner may be embarrassed to ask for the doggie-bag (or shall we call it piggie-bag?).  In other words, the diner may not even ask to take away the food. But the waiter can control such a situation by asking specific questions, and thus enforcing consumption.

It&#039;s almost a given, that if you can&#039;t eat most of your meal at a restaurant that you won&#039;t go back again. But if you are prompted to take away, you&#039;ll eat most--if not all--and hence be more likely to go back.

With the Protege, and with many of the courses, products, books etc., we systemise the consumption process. So if you can&#039;t eat your &#039;book&#039; at one sitting, or don&#039;t &#039;eat it&#039;, then we make sure to prompt you to &#039;eat&#039; using many different systems of technology and psychology.

The core is value.
If you get value, you&#039;ll come back.

But of course, most marketers completely focus on attraction and conversion, and forget about consumption. 

And that&#039;s their biggest &#039;buffet&#039; mistake. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and no.</p>
<p>It depends on how the products are engineered. If you subscribe to the products, and they have a finite life cycle, then you&#8217;re kinda doomed.</p>
<p>E.g. You go to a restaurant, and order a meal, and it&#8217;s a buffet, so darn&#8230;you&#8217;re stuck. Eat like a piggie, or get less value than you expected. But hey, there&#8217;s also the concept of a takeaway. </p>
<p>Now if the restaurant (read: infoproduct) is built as a buffet, then you&#8217;re in big trouble. But if the restaurant is built as a normal restaurant, then there are two options. The waiter dumps everything in the bin&#8211;or you take home the food and eat it another day.</p>
<p>Everything depends on two personalities. The personality of the waiter. And the personality of the diner. But there&#8217;s one personality that has a little edge. The diner may be embarrassed to ask for the doggie-bag (or shall we call it piggie-bag?).  In other words, the diner may not even ask to take away the food. But the waiter can control such a situation by asking specific questions, and thus enforcing consumption.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost a given, that if you can&#8217;t eat most of your meal at a restaurant that you won&#8217;t go back again. But if you are prompted to take away, you&#8217;ll eat most&#8211;if not all&#8211;and hence be more likely to go back.</p>
<p>With the Protege, and with many of the courses, products, books etc., we systemise the consumption process. So if you can&#8217;t eat your &#8216;book&#8217; at one sitting, or don&#8217;t &#8216;eat it&#8217;, then we make sure to prompt you to &#8216;eat&#8217; using many different systems of technology and psychology.</p>
<p>The core is value.<br />
If you get value, you&#8217;ll come back.</p>
<p>But of course, most marketers completely focus on attraction and conversion, and forget about consumption. </p>
<p>And that&#8217;s their biggest &#8216;buffet&#8217; mistake. <img src='http://spidersecret.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Garrett</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>You are absolutely right with your consumption concept Sean, just lately I have over subscribed to/purchased a bunch of info products and am unlikely to get 10% of the actual benefits through lack of time :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely right with your consumption concept Sean, just lately I have over subscribed to/purchased a bunch of info products and am unlikely to get 10% of the actual benefits through lack of time <img src='http://spidersecret.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean D'Souza</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean D'Souza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Absolutely. The bigger the hurdles, and the more we qualified, the better the consumption. When we have zero-rules, we get zero-expectations. When we have more stringent rules, we get marvellous results. 

It&#039;s a hard lesson to learn, and harder to implement, but I&#039;ve tried it back to back with two batches (e.g. Protege vs. Copywriting--which are now running at the same time--and Protege has far more uptake). The reason? 

Consumption begets consumption. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. The bigger the hurdles, and the more we qualified, the better the consumption. When we have zero-rules, we get zero-expectations. When we have more stringent rules, we get marvellous results. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a hard lesson to learn, and harder to implement, but I&#8217;ve tried it back to back with two batches (e.g. Protege vs. Copywriting&#8211;which are now running at the same time&#8211;and Protege has far more uptake). The reason? </p>
<p>Consumption begets consumption. <img src='http://spidersecret.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawud Miracle</title>
		<link>http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawud Miracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spidersecret.com/case-study-on-over-100-improved-consumption/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Interesting? So are you saying that your consumption/participation increase because you did more pre-qualifying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting? So are you saying that your consumption/participation increase because you did more pre-qualifying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

